For Instant Help & A+ Grade

UPLOAD ASSIGNMENT

  • Secure Payment Guarantee

Full Question

Manage Team Performance To Support Strategy

Task 1:

Critically assess the links between the performance of your team and the stated strategic

objectives of the organisation. You may wish to use congruence modelling for this purpose.

Identify a range of at least four different tools and techniques for setting team performance

targets. Evaluate these by comparing and contrasting them, using a table format if preferred,

identifying the advantages and disadvantages of each.

Assess their value then in the ongoing measuring and monitoring of team performance

during the year, using practical examples to illustrate what worked well and what did not work

so well in different situations or with different teams and cultures. Keep the focus on

changing and future team performance needs, considering changes in the business

environment and its impact.

Assignment Brief - Unit 702 Managing Team Performance to Support Strategy

 Page 2 of 5

Guideline word count: 1,000 - 1,100 words

A.C. 1.1 - Critically assess the links between team performance and

strategic objectives

A.C. 1.2 – Critically evaluate tools and techniques available to set team

performance targets

A.C. 1.3 – Critically evaluate the value of team performance tools to measure

future team performance

Task 2:

Explore and analysis how team performance targets are arrived at, considering the factors

that effect and influence required team performance levels, compare and contrast current

team performance with your findings.

Describe at least three different theories on motivation. Relate motivational techniques and

influencing and persuading methodologies to the encouragement of team members to commit

to shared goals, by means of practical examples.

Keeping in focus your scenarios stated strategic objectives, explore, review and critically

evaluate the contribution, effects and impact that delegation, mentoring and coaching have,

positively and negatively in contributing to the meeting of the organisations strategic

objectives. You may consider either strategic performance objectives or strategic

organisational direction.

For this task use a working team performance plan, decompose its structure, highlight areas

of logical sequencing of the processes, areas of good practice, possible errors, biases and

omissions and possible misalignment with the stated strategic objectives under review.

Guideline word count: 900 - 950 words

A.C. 2.1 – Analyze how to determine required performance targets within

teams against current performance

A.C. 2.2 – Address the need for individual commitment to team performance in

achievement of strategic objectives

A.C. 2.3 – Critically evaluate the application of delegation, mentoring and coaching to

the strategic objectives

  1. 2.4 – Critically evaluate a team performance plan to meet strategic objectives

Assignment Brief - Unit 702 Managing Team Performance to Support Strategy

Task 3:

For this task you are required to identify both tools and methods that are deployed to

conduct assessment activities of the business processes used to monitor team

performance, whilst having the flexibility and capacity to identify and make changes as

required.

For this task you are required to conduct a team performance event, conduct

assessment of team performance against pre agreed team performance measures and

targets. Use these findings to address non-compliant performance, considering

potential areas of legality, human resource policy, codes and effects on other

operational areas. You may wish to use tools and methodologies identified in AC. 3.1,

for your purposes.

For this task you are required to research and explore the critical impact and

consequences of non-compliance of team performance on meeting the already stated

strategic objectives. The implications are likely to have considerable scale and scope

of influence on operations. An Impact Statement format may be used for your

purposes.

Guideline word count: 300 - 350 words

A.C. 3.1 – Identify tools and methodologies to assess the process for monitoring team

performance and initiate changes where necessary.

  1. 3.2 – Evaluate team performance against agreed objectives of the plan and

address problematic performances.

  1. 3.3 – Critically evaluate the impact of the team performance in contributing to

meeting strategy.

Task 4:

Research three influencing mythologies, review their suitability, given your sector or

investigation, prevailing structure and culture and other factors you feel relevant, and

determine their potential effectiveness in attracting and gaining commitment of

individuals to align with the already identified organisational strategic direction.

Guideline word count: 1,050 - 1,100 words

A.C. 4.1 – Determine influencing methodologies that can gain the commitment of

individuals to strategy

A.C. 4.2 – Critically discuss the impact of individual dynamics, interests and

organisational politics on securing the commitment of individuals to strategy.

Assignment Guidelines

All work must be submitted in a single electronic document (.doc file). This

should go to the tutor and Centre Manager/Programme Director, plus one hard

copy posted to the Centre Manager.

The assignment must be the Learner’s own work and not copies of theories or

models. Direct quotes should be kept to a minimum, and shown in inverted

commas. Models described and other quotes used must be properly attributed

and referenced as appropriate. Learners must acknowledge or reference any

sources that have been used to complete the assignment, listing reference

material and web sites used.

Learners are encouraged to produce a reflective statement of no more than 300

words (which does not count towards the final word count), describing the value

and knowledge gained from undertaking this assignment. The reflective

statement is not assessed; however it encourages you to review the value and

application of your learning.

Overall word count guide: 2500 - 4500

Plagiarism and Collusion

In submitting the assignment Learner’s must complete a statement of

authenticity confirming that the work submitted for all tasks is their own. The

statement should also include the word count.

Plagiarism and collusion are treated very seriously. Plagiarism involves presenting

work, excerpts, ideas or passages of another author without appropriate

referencing and attribution. Collusion occurs when two or more learners submit

work which is so alike in ideas, content, wording and/or structure that the

similarity goes beyond what might have been mere coincidence.

Appendices

Separate Appendices should not be used. Any use of tables, graphs, diagrams,

Gantt chart and flowcharts etc. that support the main report should be

incorporated into the back of the assignment report that is submitted. Any

published secondary information such as annual reports and company literature,

should be referenced in the main text of the assignment but not included.

Confidentiality

Where a Learner is using organisational information that deals with sensitive

material or issues, they must seek the advice and permission from that

organisation about its inclusion. Where confidentiality is an issue, Learners are

advised to anonymise their assignment report so that it cannot be attributed to

that particular organisation.

Word Count Policy

In total, the assignment report should be between 2500 - 4500 words. Learners

must comply with the required word count, within a margin of +10%.These rules

exclude the index (if used), headings and information contained within references

and bibliographies. When an assessment task requires learners to produce

presentation slides with supporting notes, the word count applies to the

supporting notes only.

Referencing and Professionalism

A professional approach to work is expected from all learners. Learners must

therefore identify and acknowledge ALL sources/methodologies/applications used.

The learner must use an appropriate referencing system to achieve this. Marks

Assignment Brief - Unit 702 Managing Team Performance to Support Strategy

are not awarded for the use of English; however the learner must express ideas

clearly and ensure that appropriate terminology is used to convey accuracy in

meaning.

Submission of Assignments

All work to be submitted on the due date as per Centre advice.

All work must be submitted in a single electronic document (.doc file). This should

go to the tutor and Centre Manager/Programme Director, plus one hard copy

posted to the Centre Manager.

Question Page Order Now Banner | GotoAssignmentHelp.com

Along with hundreds of vivid topic assignments "Manage Team Performance To Support Strategy' is also covered by GotoAssignmentHelp assignment help experts and they are capable enough to craft a premium quality assignment to secure you top grades! The work process consists of a few prominant steps like research on the topic, making a plan how to execute it, prepare the whole assignment by strictly following all the guidelines and the most important thing- Deadline- that is never missed.
With a faculty strength of 2500+ PhD experts GotoAssignmentHelp team has successfully delivered 571922+ premium quality assignments on 196+ topics and still counting. GotoAssignmentHelp team always caters for students' benefit. Hence, contact through live chat support 24/7 for any kind of assignment related help.

Select Your Expert